Enercast Pipe Monitor
Scoring Methodology

How Enercast Scores
Pipeline Notices.

Overview

Every pipeline notice detected by Enercast is evaluated by an AI model and assigned a severity score from 1 to 5. The score reflects the expected market impact of the event — specifically its potential to affect regional basis differentials, physical supply availability, and Henry Hub price direction over the following 1–5 trading days.

Scores are generated automatically within seconds of a notice being detected. They are not guaranteed to be accurate and should be treated as a starting point for analysis, not a definitive assessment.

The Severity Scale

Scoring Inputs

The AI model considers the following factors when assigning a severity score:

Trading Notes

In addition to the severity score, each alert includes a plain-language trading note that identifies the most likely market implication. Trading notes cover:

Limitations

AI-generated scores and trading notes are produced automatically and may contain errors. Pipeline notices can be ambiguous, and the true market impact of any event depends on factors not visible in the notice text alone — including real-time flow data, storage levels, weather, and market positioning. Always apply independent judgment before acting on any Enercast alert.

Enercast does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or timeliness of any score, summary, or trading note. See the Disclaimer for full terms.

Duplicate and Revision Handling

Pipeline operators frequently revise notices — sometimes dozens of times for a single event. Enercast tracks revisions and suppresses duplicate alerts for the same underlying event unless a material change is detected (e.g., a significant change in capacity volume or a status change from planned to force majeure). The latest revision is always displayed on the website.